From
the World National-Anarchist Alliance.
As soon as the perspective outlined here becomes the
dominant consensus among anarchists generally, then anarchists will be in a
position to assume the role of the leadership corps of a much larger array of
secessionist and radical decentralist movments with a strong
libertarian-populist orientation.
People will be shocked to find out that I do not come from a
racialist standpoint at all.
So why do I associate with National Anarchists when the
majority of them are racialist?
I tolerate it because they wish to keep it confined to their
own communities and out of those who do not want it. Also, the concept of
anarchism according to tribes is in line with Mikhail Bakunin’s material.
People have the right to associate along whatever lines they wish to, and no
one else has to like it in order to give them permission.
Another thing to mention is that those who are racial
separatists are not so due to belief of racial superiority. This is at least
the case with the majority of National Anarchists. I get the true feeling that
they are sincere when saying this. To them it is an actual matter of
preservation, and I can learn to respect that much.
We all have ideals which we hope will pass on to the next
generation. In my case it is syndicalism and Zen Buddhism. Also I believe that
families should be strong. There are many things that I could go on about for
hours, but they may not be important to the majority of people. This is my case
in point why we should adopt National Anarchism. People are never going to
agree with everyone else on even key points. Various communities are needed to
suit the major preferences that people may have. The ideas worth anything will
succeed. Those which are not too shitty will at least sustain. Those which are
worthless will crumble to the ground. This will all be on those in the
community who chose that particular path.
The beauty of National Anarchism is that tribes could be
created upon any values. I believe that as this concept expands, race will
become a minority view. Basically it is only a revival of Anarcho-Tribalism.
However, people are no longer writing under that name, and no one can be found
to associate with. Basically this gives us more opportunities for talks.
Associations between tribes can be helpful in dire
circumstances. National Anarchism is an answer to the anarchist with suffixes
syndrome. We have anywhere from Anarcho-Capitalists to Anarcho-Communists. With
the National Anarchist system, each tribe could implement whichever system they
want. This makes working across the various categories much simpler. If the
other anarchists could stop calling it “neo-fascism in disguise”, we could have
gained much more ground by now.
Part of this problem is the fault of some National Anarchists
who refuse to acknowledge anyone who is not dividing along racial lines.
Another part is on the other side not seeing that people have the liberty to do
so if they so desire. They wish to use coercion to make people not racialist,
and this simply will never work. I foresee a fairs being made in the future for
tribes to debate ideologies. A debate with good ground rules and decency on
both sides can convince someone of the better position. If no one is convinced,
both parties go back home to the area of their tribe unscathed.
National Anarchism (Anarcho-Tribalism) is the way to unite
all anarchists toward working for anarchy without compromise.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Related Articles of Interest:
* Is National-Anarchism An Oxymoron? - National-Anarchism in a Nutshell
* National-Anarchist Communities: Will I Be Accepted?
* National-Anarchist Communities: Will I Be Accepted?
* Lies About National-Anarchism
* Is National-Anarchism An Oxymoron? - National-Anarchism in a Nutshell
* Radio interviews with Welf Herfurth
* Radio interviews with Craig Fitzgerald
* National-Anarchism: The Way of the Future
* Will I Be Accepted?
* Answering the critics in three albums
* Allegations Regarding National-Anarchism
* So apparently national anarchists are all violent racists who want to kill all non-White Christians…
* Radio interviews with Welf Herfurth
* Radio interviews with Craig Fitzgerald
* National-Anarchism: The Way of the Future
* Will I Be Accepted?
* Answering the critics in three albums
* Allegations Regarding National-Anarchism
* So apparently national anarchists are all violent racists who want to kill all non-White Christians…
-----------------------------------------------
* Facebook: National-Anarchist
Movement (N-AM)
Posts
